In re: ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INCORPORATED v. MCKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANSFORMATION SERVICES US LLC, (Turnaround Advisor for Alpha…

17-2268Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit6 de set. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2268
In re: ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INCORPORATED,
Debtor.
----------------------------------
MAR-BOW VALUE PARTNERS, LLC,
Creditor - Appellant,
v.
MCKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANSFORMATION SERVICES US LLC,
(Turnaround Advisor for Alpha Natural Resources),
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
No. 17-2269
In re: ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INCORPORATED,
Debtor.
----------------------------------

-- 1 of 3 --

2
MAR-BOW VALUE PARTNERS, LLC,
Creditor - Appellant,
v.
MCKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANSFORMATION SERVICES US LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00612-MHL; 3:16-cv-00799-
MHL)
Submitted: August 24, 2018 Decided: September 6, 2018
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susan M. Freeman, Daniel A. Arellano, LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE
LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Steven Rhodes, STEVEN RHODES CONSULTING, LLC, Ann
Arbor, Michigan; David R. Ruby, William D. Prince IV, Michael G. Matheson,
THOMPSONMCMULLAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Sheldon S. Toll, LAW OFFICES
OF SHELDON S. TOLL PLLC, Southfield, Michigan, for Appellant. Bruce H. Matson,
Christopher L. Perkins, LECLAIRRYAN, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia; Martin J.
Bienenstock, Ehud Barak, Joshua A. Esses, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, New York, New
York; Roy T. Englert, Jr., Lukman Azeez, ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT,
ORSECK, UNTEREINER & SAUBER LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC, appeals from the
district court’s orders dismissing MarBow’s appeals from numerous bankruptcy court
orders in the underlying Chapter 11 proceeding. The district court dismissed the appeals
as equitably moot and/or for lack of standing. We have reviewed the record included on
appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC v.
McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Servs. U.S., LLC, Nos. 3:16-cv-00612-MHL;
3:16-cv-00799-MHL (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2017). We deny Mar-Bow’s motions for
judicial notice, for leave to file a supplemental brief, and to hold the appeals in abeyance,
and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.