Jessica Cottle, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. Monitech, Inc.

18-1080Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de ago. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1080
JESSICA COTTLE, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONITECH, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Terence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:17-cv-00137-BO)
Submitted: July 30, 2018 Decided: August 2, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron D. Radbil, GREENWALD DAVIDSON RADBIL PLLC, Austin, Texas, for
Appellant. Carl N. Patterson, Jr., Clifton L. Brinson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT,
DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jessica Cottle appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging a
violation of the Consumer Leasing Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1667-1667f (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Cottle v. Monitech, Inc., No. 7:17-cv-00137-BO
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.