Charles D. Willingham v. Christian A. Strangfeld

18-1484Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30 de jul. de 2018

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1484
CHARLES D. WILLINGHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTIAN A. STRANGFELD; MIMI EILENE REYNOLDS; IRON WORKS
TEMP SER.; BRASFIELD & GORRIE CORP.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:18-cv-00092-MOC-DLH)
Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 30, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles D. Willingham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles D. Willingham appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Willingham’s
informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition,
Willingham has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under
Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.