Spencer Streno v. Shenandoah University

18-2039Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 de abr. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2039
SPENCER STRENO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00068-EKD-JCH)
Submitted: March 28, 2019 Decided: April 5, 2019
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelle Owens, AGEE OWENS, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Katherine
C. Ondeck, Brian Adam Scotti, GORDON & REES, LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Spencer Streno appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion to amend the judgment in his underlying civil suit. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Streno v. Shenandoah Univ., No. 5:16-cv-00068-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Aug. 6,
2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.