Victor O. Jones, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank N.a.

18-2168Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31 de mai. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2168
VICTOR O. JONES, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.; GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2006-026; JOHN DOES
1-100,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:17-cv-02486-BHH)
Submitted: May 28, 2019 Decided: May 31, 2019
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor O. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Todd Carroll, Columbia, South
Carolina, Shelton Sterling Laney, III, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Victor O. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ complaint with prejudice
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman* doctrine. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 6:17-cv-
02486-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 4, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 263
U.S. 413 (1923).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.