Rabbi James H. Raynor v. HAROLD W. CLARKE; MS. PATILLO, Accounting Office; T. PRESTON, Accounting Office

18-6919Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de jan. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6919
RABBI JAMES H. RAYNOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE; MS. PATILLO, Accounting Office; T. PRESTON,
Accounting Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01308-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: December 28, 2018 Decided: January 17, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Herman Raynor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James H. Raynor appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Raynor v. Clarke, No. 1:17-cv-01308-LMB-JFA
(E.D. Va. July 11, 2018). We deny Raynor’s motions to compel documents, to compel
discovery, to enforce settlement agreement, to waive fees under the Prison Litigation
Reform Act, and to file a formal want of debt. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.