Anthony E. Vazquez v. J. RAY ORMOND, Warden

19-6061Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit3 de jul. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6061
ANTHONY E. VAZQUEZ,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
J. RAY ORMOND, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00144-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: June 7, 2019 Decided: July 3, 2019
Before KING, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony E. Vazquez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony E. Vazquez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying reconsideration. The court
determined that Vazquez could not proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because his petition
did not satisfy the criteria articulated in United States v. Wheeler, 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th
Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 1318 (2019). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm
the district court’s orders. See Vazquez v. Ormond, No. 1:18-cv-00144-LMB-JFA (E.D.
Va. July 23, 2018; filed Nov. 26, 2018, entered Nov. 27, 2018). We deny a certificate of
appealability as unnecessary. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012); United States v.
McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.