William Scott Davis, Jr. v. William P. Barr, Usag

19-6265Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18 de jul. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6265
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, USAG; JAMES W. GARNETT, JR., Piedmont Regional Jail
Chairman; PAUL SEGRUE, USMS Deputy; USMS DEPUTY ADAMS;
DONALD HUNTER, Superintendent; CAPTAIN UNKNOWN; MAJOR
UNKNOWN,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:17-cv-00514-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his
postjudgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Sessions, No.
2:17-cv-00514-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 1, 2019). We deny Davis’ motion to
consolidate his pending cases. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.