Carlos H. Ipina Jimenez v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

20-1189Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de out. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1189
CARLOS H. IPINA JIMENEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: October 1, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evan J. Law, Culpeper, Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney
General, Justin Markel, Senior Litigation Counsel, Andrew Oliveira, Office of Immigration
Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Carlos H. Ipina Jimenez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of
an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the
Immigration Judge’s decision denying Ipina Jimenez’s application for asylum and
withholding of removal. We have reviewed Ipina Jimenez’s claims and the administrative
record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of
the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Ipina Jimenez (B.I.A. Jan. 21, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.