Dawn Perlmutter; Thomas M. Bolick v. Trina Varone

20-2192Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de mai. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2192
DAWN PERLMUTTER; THOMAS M. BOLICK,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
TRINA VARONE; JEFFREY VARONE; SCOTT PERLMUTTER; GARY
ALTMAN; ALTMAN & ASSOCIATES; SUTTON INVESTMENTS LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:19-cv-03402-PX)
Submitted: March 30, 2021 Decided: May 25, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dawn Perlmutter, Thomas M. Bolick, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to
dismiss, denying Appellants’ motion for reconsideration, and denying Appellants’ motion
for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perlmutter v. Varone, No.
8:19-cv-03402-PX (D. Md. June 1, 2020; Oct. 13, 2020). We further reject Appellants’
contention that 4th Cir. R. 46(f) is unconstitutional and note that we have fully considered
the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.