Susan Woodard v. Sdh Services East

20-2300Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 de mar. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2300
SUSAN WOODARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SDH SERVICES EAST,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
WHITNEY BETTIE, General Manager; LOREE SORENSON, Senior Manager,
Employee Relations,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:19-cv-00335-CMC)
Submitted: February 28, 2022 Decided: March 15, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Susan Woodard, Appellant Pro Se. William Lee Duda, Christopher Ray Thomas,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Susan Woodard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing her employment discrimination complaint pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, 41(b), as a sanction for her failure to comply with discovery rules. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Woodard v. SDH Servs. E., No. 0:19-cv-00335-CMC
(D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.