Raymond Aigbekaen v. Homewood Suites by Hilton; Alan Manandahar

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7207
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON; ALAN MANANDAHAR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-02167-JKB)
Submitted: March 26, 2021 Decided: April 2, 2021
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint
as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). On appeal, we confine our review
to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Aigbekaen’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177
(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules,
our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --