Joshua Anderson v. Mark Bolster

20-7707Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 de out. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7707
JOSHUA ANDERSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARK BOLSTER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00075-LO-TCB)
Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: Octcober 4, 2022
Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew James Mezger, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Gary Anderson appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged his convictions by a general
court-martial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant Anderson’s motions to file supplemental informal briefs, we affirm the
court’s orders. Anderson v. Bolster, No. 1:19-cv-00075-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2020;
filed Aug. 27, 2020 & entered Aug. 28, 2020). We deny Anderson’s motion to substitute
party, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.