21-1333•Dania Leticia Manzano; J.y.m.m. v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
21-1333Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de jun. de 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1333
DANIA LETICIA MANZANO; J.Y.M.M.,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: May 18, 2022 Decided: June 17, 2022
Before MOTZ, RICHARDSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Ivan Yacub, Lauren R. Truslow, YACUB LAW OFFICES, Woodbridge,
Virginia, for Petitioners. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Nancy
Friedman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Margaret A. O’Donnell, Office of Immigration
Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dania Leticia Manzano and her minor child, natives and citizens of Honduras,
petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing
their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Manzano’s request for asylum
and withholding of removal. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that
the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings,
see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief,
see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Manzano (B.I.A. Mar. 3, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.