Michael Wayne Hill v. Michael Wayne Revells

21-2110Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de dez. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2110
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL WAYNE REVELLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:20-cv-00233-FL)
Submitted: December 16, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Wayne Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Wayne Hill appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment
motion for order of regress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Revells, No.
4:20-cv-00233-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.