21-2176•Andre Juste v. Lindsay Annmarie Brennan
21-2176Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 de fev. de 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2176
ANDRE JUSTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
MOTJUSTE TIRADE OF VIM ANDRE JUSTE,
Plaintiff,
v.
LINDSAY ANNMARIE BRENNAN; LINDSAY ANNMARIE PHILLIPS;
STEFANIE FAITH BRENNAN; WAL-MART CORPORATE, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00183-GMG-JES)
Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: February 28, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Juste, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andre Juste seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for
lack of jurisdiction and with prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final
judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a
jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its order on January 14, 2014. Juste filed the notice of
appeal on October 18, 2021. Because Juste failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to
obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.