Jeffrey A. Pleasant v. MARK BRECKON, Warden, United States Penitentiary Lee

21-6071Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 de jan. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6071
JEFFREY A. PLEASANT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARK BRECKON, Warden, United States Penitentiary Lee,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:19-cv-00200-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: November 29, 2022 Decided: January 4, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey A. Pleasant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey A. Pleasant appeals the district court’s orders dismissing for lack of
jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denying reconsideration. Applying the
principles as set forth in our recent decision in Slusser v. Vereen, 36 F.4th 590, 594-96
(4th Cir. 2022), we agree with the district court that Pleasant failed to satisfy the
requirements of the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). Accordingly, having reviewed
the record and finding no reversible error, we affirm the district court’s orders. Pleasant v.
Breckon, No. 7:19-cv-00200-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2020; Jan. 11, 2021). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.