United States of America v. Jerome Nathaniel Holloway

21-6161Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de dez. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6161
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEROME NATHANIEL HOLLOWAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cr-00018-GJH-1)
Submitted: November 30, 2021 Decided: December 2, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Burnham, BURNHAM & GOROKHOV, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Jonathan F. Lenzner, Acting United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, Joseph R.
Baldwin, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Nathaniel Holloway appeals the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the
record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Holloway’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating
standard of review), cert. denied, No. 21-5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.