Timothy Royal King v. Erik A. Hooks

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6561
TIMOTHY ROYAL KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
MICHAEL BLANKEY; DERICK WHITE; DAYVON D. PERSON; LARRY
FULLER; TIMOTHY BOYD; CHRIS PEARSALL; JIMMY TINSLEY; RONALD
BLAIR WINSTEAD; GREGORY PORTER; CORTNEY LEACH; MILTON L.
LAWRENCE; JOHN MCNEILL; XAVIER KINNEY; IRVIN VASQUEZ;
DONALD USEVICH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ERIK A. HOOKS; W. DAVID GUICE; CYNTHIA THORNTON; MELANIE
SHELTON; KENNETH LASSITER; BETTY BROWN; SUSAN ADDAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03043-FL)
Submitted: January 25, 2022 Decided: February 7, 2022
Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Timothy Royal King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Royal King appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment
on his civil rights complaint in which he raised claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to
2000cc-5. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Hooks, No. 5:17-ct-03043-FL
(E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2020; Mar. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --