George A. Barfield v. Sheriff Lemme Smith

21-6854Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 de out. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6854
GEORGE A. BARFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF LEMME SMITH; ADMINISTRATOR WARREN, Greene County
Detention Center; JANICE PRIDGEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03193-FL)
Submitted: September 28, 2021 Decided: October 8, 2021
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George A. Barfield, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE BOND
DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Christina Jansen Banfield,
HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George A. Barfield appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Barfield v. Smith, No. 5:19-ct-03193-FL (E.D.N.C.
May 20, 2021). We also deny Barfield’s motions to assign counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.