James F. Eason v. Julian Priest

21-7119Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10 de set. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7119
JAMES F. EASON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JULIAN PRIEST; SGT. MCPHERSON; BILLY MCCUMBEE; FRANKLIN
GRAHAM; JEFFREY K. POPE; MONICA BOND; PAULA JONES; J. C.
HUGGINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03259-BO)
Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James F. Eason, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James F. Eason appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Eason v. Priest, No. 5:19-ct-03259-BO (E.D.N.C. June 25, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.