Malcolm Muhammad v. WILLIAM E. JACKSON, Chaplain; JONES, Chaplain, Chaplain at SISP

21-7360Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 de jun. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7360
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM E. JACKSON, Chaplain; JONES, Chaplain, Chaplain at SISP,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WILLIAM JARRETT, Assistant Warden; GREGORY L. HOLLOWAY, Eastern
Regional Administrator; R. WOODSON, Regional Ombudsmen; QUEEN
GOODWYN, Food Service Manager; S. TURNER, Food Service Manager; E.
WITT, Grievance Coordinator; TESEA HARVEY, Statewide Ombudsmen
Manager,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00746-LO-JFA)
Submitted: May 30, 2023 Decided: June 8, 2023
Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
to Appellees and dismissing Muhammad’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
See Muhammad v. Jackson, No. 1:19-cv-00746-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2021). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.