Khalil J. Kimbrough v. KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent

21-7713Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 de mai. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7713
KHALIL J. KIMBROUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent; HAROLD CLARKE, Director of DOC;
NURSE MEADE, Director of the Medical Staff; COMMONWEALTH OF
VIRGINIA; STAFFORD, VA; FREDERICKSBURG, VA; SPOTSYVANIA, VA;
KING GEORGE, VA; MANAGER OF SUMMIT FOOD SERVICES; STAFF OF
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00060-RCY-RJK)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khalil J. Kimbrough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Khalil J. Kimbrough appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a
court order. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Kimbrough’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an
important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved
in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.