United States of America v. Tyrone Young

21-7759Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de mai. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7759
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Danville. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (4:18-cr-00017-JPJ-1)
Submitted: May 19, 2022 Decided: May 23, 2022
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Young, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Kristina Munro, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Young appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for
reconsideration of the court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-
391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse of
discretion in the district court’s determination that the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors
weighed against compassionate release. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329
(4th Cir.) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate
release motions), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.