Andrew Elliott Wilkinson v. Finra; Place and Hanley, Lcc

22-1090Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 de jan. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1090
ANDREW ELLIOTT WILKINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FINRA; PLACE AND HANLEY, LCC,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a Wells Fargo Advisors;
ANGIE OSTENDARP; MIKE QUIMBY; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00580-RJC)
Submitted: December 22, 2022 Decided: January 26, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Elliott Wilkinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Elliott Wilkinson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil
complaint both for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and as barred by res judicata.
We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We deny Wilkinson’s motions for a transcript at government
expense, for copies of sealed documents, to participate in criminal proceedings, and to
amend his complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.