Justin Franklin Kirk v. Constellis, LLC

22-1191Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18 de mar. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1191
JUSTIN FRANKLIN KIRK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONSTELLIS, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00146-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 20, 2023
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Charity C. Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT & SWIFT,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. G. Bethany Ingle,
Lauren M. Bridenbaugh, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Tysons Corner, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Justin Franklin Kirk appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion to
amend his complaint and granting summary judgment in favor of Constellis, LLC, in Kirk’s
civil action. We have reviewed the record included on appeal as well as the parties’ briefs
and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Kirk v. Constellis, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00146-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2021;
Jan. 20, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.