Audrey L. Kimner v. State of South Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1194
AUDREY L. KIMNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; JOHN NICHOLS, Head of Judicial Dept. in
South Carolina; LESLEY COGGIOLA, Disciplinary Counsel of SC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:21-cv-03776-CMC)
Submitted: May 19, 2022 Decided: May 24, 2022
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Audrey L. Kimner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Audrey L. Kimner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Kimner’s amended complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.*
Kimner v. South Carolina, No. 3:21-cv-03776-CMC (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2022). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We note that Kimner’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s finding
that Appellees Nichols and Coggiola were entitled to prosecutorial immunity. Kimner has
therefore forfeited appellate review of that portion of the district court’s order. See 4th Cir.
R. 34(b) (limiting this court’s review to issues raised in informal brief); Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (same).

-- 2 of 2 --