Susan W. Vaughan v. Kathlyn S. Romm, an individual

22-1727Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de abr. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1727
SUSAN W. VAUGHAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLYN S. ROMM, an individual; RAY MATUSKO, an individual;
COURTNEY HULL, an individual; MEADER W. HARRISS, III, an individual;
DEPUTY CLERK DOE, an individual,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00042-D)
Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024
Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susan W. Vaughan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Susan W. Vaughan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Vaughan’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Vaughan v. Romm, No. 2:21-
cv-00042-D (E.D.N.C. June 27, 2022). We deny Vaughan’s motion to correct errors in her
informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.