22-1884•Faresha Sims v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
22-1884Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16 de dez. de 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1884
FARESHA SIMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM CORPORATION; LISA
ROWEN; LINDA GOETZ; UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL
CENTER, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00295-CCB)
Submitted: November 13, 2023 Decided: December 15, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Faresha Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Jocelyn Renee Cuttino, Grace Ellen Speights, MORGAN
LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Vishal Hemchandra Shah, SHAH
LITIGATION, PLLC, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Faresha Sims appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants summary
judgment and denying Sims’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration.∗ We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Sims’ motions to
amend her informal brief and exceed the length limitations and affirm. Sims v. Univ. of
Md. Med. Sys. Corp., No. 1:19-cv-00295-CCB (D. Md. June 23, 2022). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ To the extent Sims seeks to challenge the postjudgment orders denying her recusal
motion, she did not note an appeal of those orders, nor did she file an informal brief within
the applicable appeal period that we can construe as a notice of appeal. Accordingly, those
orders are not before us.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.