Laylah Marsh v. the University of North Carolina at Wilmington

22-1998Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 de jun. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1998
LAYLAH MARSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT WILMINGTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:21-cv-00189-BO)
Submitted: May 17, 2023 Decided: June 15, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Laylah Marsh, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Potter, Assistant Attorney General; NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jeremy Michael
Falcone, Alex John Hagan, Raleigh, North Carolina, Dixie Thomas Wells, ELLIS &
WINTERS, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Laylah Marsh appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for
judgment on the pleadings, dismissing Marsh’s lawsuit alleging breach of contract and
violations of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 to 1688,
and denying her motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marsh v. Univ.
of North Carolina at Wilmington, No. 7:21-cv-00189-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.