Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr. v. City of Chesapeake, in its official capacity

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2210
JUPITER DENNELL WILSON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, in its official capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:19-cv-00486-MSD-RJK)
Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 26, 2023
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Ellen Frances Bergren, OFFICE OF THE
CITY ATTORNEY, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders granting summary
judgment in favor of the City of Chesapeake on Wilson’s discrimination and retaliation
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e
to 2000e-17, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621to 634, and
denying Wilson’s postjudgment motions. Limiting our review of the record to the issues
raised in Wilson’s informal brief, we find no reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see
also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an
important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved
in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Wilson v. City of
Chesapeake, No. 2:19-cv-00486-MSD-RJK (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2022; Nov. 16, 2022). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --