Montgomery Carl Akers v. Jamie Conover

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2254
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMIE CONOVER; GUY PAGLI; JODI WAMBLER; KATHERINE N.
SIEREVELD; KATHY S. HILL; N. SIMPKINS; APRYL CRUIT; HENRY RIVAS;
MILTON NEUMANN; GARY BURGESS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00109-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 27, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Montgomery Carl Akers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Montgomery Carl Akers appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Akers’ civil
complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute, denying his motions for a preliminary
injunction, and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Akers v. Conover,
No. 3:22-cv-00109-GMG-RWT (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 19, 2022; Oct. 13, 2022). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --