United States of America v. William Stallings, a/k/a Ty

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6032
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM STALLINGS, a/k/a Ty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Elizabeth City. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00018-FL-1)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 27, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Stallings, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney,
Daniel William Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Stallings appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a district
court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v.
Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. Stallings, No. 2:15-cr-00018-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2021). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --