Benjamin Johnson v. Bryan P. Stirling; April Clarke

22-6332Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de jul. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6332
BENJAMIN JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN P. STIRLING; APRIL CLARKE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (2:20-cv-03831-RBH)
Submitted: June 28, 2022 Decided: July 1, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Johnson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to
state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the denial of
relief on Johnson’s claims against Defendant Bryan Stirling.* Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Johnson v. Stirling, No. 2:20-cv-03831-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 8, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Despite receiving notice of his right to do so, Johnson failed to object to the
recommended disposition of the claim against Defendant April Clarke and, therefore, has
waived appellate review of that claim. See Martin v. Duffy, 898 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir.
2017).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.