Frankie Miller, a/k/a Frankie Miller-El v. T. JARRELL, Lieutenant Colonel

22-6784Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de nov. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6784
FRANKIE MILLER, a/k/a Frankie Miller-El,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
T. JARRELL, Lieutenant Colonel; W. JARRETT, Assistant Warden; W.
TEACHEY, Major; J. STITH, Lieutenant; W. JOYNER, Lieutenant; R.
TIMMONS; J. EVERETTE; R. NEVILLE; B. BURNSIDE, Correction Officer; E.
PEARSON, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
K. PHILLIPS; C. PUTNEY; C. BOONE; G. HOLLOWAY; TALBOT; H.
CLARKE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:18-cv-00091-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Frankie M. Miller, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Frankie M. Miller, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Jarrell,
No. 2:18-cv-00091-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2021; filed July 6, 2022 & entered
July 7, 2022). We deny Miller’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.