United States of America v. Thomas Grandville Alston

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7312
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
THOMAS GRANDVILLE ALSTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:11-cr-00012-D-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 22, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Grandville Alston, Appellant Pro Se. John Parks Newby, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Grandville Alston appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). After reviewing the record, we
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Alston’s motion. See
United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (per curiam) (stating standard), cert.
denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
United States v. Alston, No. 5:11-cr-00012-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2022). We deny
Alston’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --