Timothy McNeal v. J. HUTCHINSON, Acting Warden

22-7319Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de abr. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7319
TIMOTHY MCNEAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. HUTCHINSON, Acting Warden; C. NEVILS; MR. GLENN; MS. LANHAM;
MS. NECOMB; MR. TAYLOR; MS. JOHNSON; MS. V. MARTIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:21-cv-03431-JFA)
Submitted: March 21, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024
Before THACKER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy McNeal, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney,
Jennifer L. Mallory, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy McNeal appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to
dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment, and dismissing his complaint, which
raised Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment claims against several prison employees under
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See McNeal v. Hutchinson, No. 2:21-cv-03431-JFA (D.S.C. Nov. 2,
2022). We further deny McNeal’s motion for default. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.