Joseph A. Stallard v. United States Patent and Trademark Office

23-1245Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de jul. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1245
JOSEPH A. STALLARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01236-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: July 20, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph A. Stallard, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph A. Stallard appeals the district court’s order granting the United States Patent
& Trademark Office’s (USPTO) motion to dismiss Stallard’s civil action under the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 500 to 559. Stallard’s action challenged
§ 1202.10 of the USPTO’s Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure, which provides
examining attorneys with guidance on criteria for evaluating an application to register a
character in a creative work as a trademark. Upon review of the record, we discern no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Stallard v. USPTO, No.
1:22-cv-01236-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.