MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, a/k/a Doctor Faltas, a/k/a Doctor Assa’ad-Faltas, MD, MPH v. ALAN MCCRORY WILSON, SC’s Attorney General (SCAG), officially for prospective relief

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1372
MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, a/k/a Doctor Faltas, a/k/a Doctor
Assa’ad-Faltas, MD, MPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALAN MCCRORY WILSON, SC’s Attorney General (SCAG), officially for
prospective relief and individually for nominal damages; SARA HEATHER
SAVITZ WEISS, officially and individually; BYRON E. GIPSON, officially for
prospective relief; GARY WATTS, officially for prospective relief; RONALDO
MYERS, officially for prospective relief; HUGH RYAN, officially for prospective
relief; HERVERY YOUNG, officially and individually; ROBERT MICHAEL
DUDEK, officially and individually; E. FIELDING PRINGLE, officially and
individually; MARK SCHNEE, individually; APRIL W. SAMPSON, officially and
individually; THEODORE N. LUPTON, individually; TRISTAN MICHAEL
SHAFFER, individually; LARA M. CAUDY, individually; JOHN H. STROM,
individually; CASSITY BREWER, individually; CHARLES RANDOLPH WHITE,
individually; LARRY WAYNE MASON, individually; DINAH GAIL STEELE,
individually; ANY AND ALL OF DEFENDANTS’ NECESSARY AGENTS, each
such agent solely officially and solely prospective relief where applicable,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-02479-TLW)
Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 23, 2023
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915, Assa’ad-Faltas’ complaint raising several civil rights and state law tort claims
against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Assa’ad-Faltas v. Wilson, No. 3:20-cv-
02479-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2023). We deny all pending motions. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --