V.e. v. University of Maryland Baltimore County, Maryland

23-1955Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 de out. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1955
V.E.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:22-cv-02338-JRR)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 24, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Rignal W. Baldwin V, Nathan P. Short, BALDWIN LEGAL GROUP, LLC,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Anthony G. Brown, Attorney General, Ariel S.
Lichterman, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
V.E. appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action and denying her
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion seeking alteration or amendment of the dismissal judgment
or, alternatively, leave to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. V.E. v. Univ. of Md. Balt. Cnty., No.
1:22-cv-02338-JRR (D. Md. Apr. 21 & Aug. 10, 2023). We deny V.E.’s motion to extend
the time for filing a reply brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.