Roger Lee Morse v. Virginia Department of Corrections

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-2039
ROGER LEE MORSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CHADWICK DOTSON, in his
individual and official capacity as Director for the Virginia Department of
Corrections; PATRICIA S. BISHOP, in her individual and official capacity as
Director for the Virginia Retirement System; JOSEPH WALTERS, in his individual
and official capacity as Deputy Director of Administration for Virginia Department
of Corrections; BETH CABELL, in her individual and official capacity as Warden;
TONY DARDEN, in his Individual and official capacity as Assistant Warden;
KEVIN CLARK, in his individual and official capacity as Major, Correctional
Officer; CHRISTOPHER M. GRAB; WILLIAM MUSE, in his individual and
official capacity as Hearing Officer for the Office of Employment Dispute
Resolution; CARL W. SCHMIDT, in his individual and official capacity as Hearing
Officer for the Office of Employment Dispute Resolution; ROBIN H. LOW, in her
individual and official capacity as Supervisor of Purchase of Prior Service for the
Virginia Retirement System,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00168-MHL)
Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: October 22, 2024
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Lee Morse, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Nicholas Regnery, Assistant Attorney
General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Roger Lee Morse appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b), Morse’s second amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Morse v. VDOC,
No. 3:21-cv-00168-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --