James C. McNeill v. Monica Bond

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6181
JAMES C. MCNEILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONICA BOND,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CAMERON GADDY; NICOLAS BUSTILLOS; FNU VIGO; WHITNEY
REVELS; CONNIE LOCKLEAR-JONES; SHERYL HATCHER; KATY POOLE;
WILLIAM BULLARD; DEAN LOCKLEAR; PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR;
RONALD E. COVINGTON; BARSHA SIMS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00786-LCB-JLW)
Submitted: September 16, 2024 Decided: November 14, 2024
Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Allen Paschal, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Monica
Bond’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law in McNeill’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. McNeill v. Gaddy, No. 1:18-cv-00786-LCB-JLW
(M.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2023). We deny McNeill’s motion for leave to file a supplement to his
informal opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --