United States of America v. Felipe Valerio Plasencia, a/k/a Phillip Valerio, a/k/a Felipe Valerio, a/k/a Jose…

23-6466Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de nov. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6466
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FELIPE VALERIO PLASENCIA, a/k/a Phillip Valerio, a/k/a Felipe Valerio, a/k/a
Jose Rodriguez, a/k/a Philip Santiogo, a/k/a Philip Walerio,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00400-CMH-1)
Submitted: November 21, 2023 Decided: November 28, 2023
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Felipe Valerio Plasencia, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Felipe Valerio Plasencia appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find
no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Plasencia, No. 1:03-cr-00400-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2023). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.