In re: David Hill

24-1182Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de abr. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1182
In re: DAVID HILL,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia at Alexandria. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)
Submitted: April 18, 2024 Decided: April 22, 2024
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has
unduly delayed in ruling on several postjudgment motions filed in Hill’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255
proceeding. See United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. Va., PACER
Nos. 464-69). Hill seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act.
However, upon review, the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court,
especially since, in the interim period, Hill has noted several appeals from other district
court orders. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition.∗ We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
∗ While we deny mandamus relief at this juncture, we encourage the district court
to act as expeditiously as possible in this matter.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.