Oluwakemi Adewol, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Tginesis LLC

24-1753Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13 de jun. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1753
OLUWAKEMI ADEWOL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TGINESIS LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:23-cv-00509-GLR)
Submitted: February 25, 2025 Decided: June 13, 2025
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Steffan T. Keeton, THE KEETON FIRM LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for
Appellant. Deirdre A. Close, Carson R. Griffis, CROKE FAIRCHILD DUARTE &
BERES, Chicago, Illinois; Michael D. Meuti, Meegan Brooks, Sheila M. Prendergast,
BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Oluwakemi Adewol appeals the district court’s order dismissing for failure to state
a claim her civil complaint alleging a violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Adewol v. TGINESIS LLC, No. 1:23-cv-00509-GLR (D. Md. July 10,
2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.