Kirk Russel Marsh v. STATE OF UTAH, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Utah

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1964
KIRK RUSSEL MARSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF UTAH, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Utah; MICHAEL
EDWARDS, State Judge; DANA EMMONS, Court Appointed Reunification
Counselor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00516-PTG-IDD)
Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 9, 2024
Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kirk Russel Marsh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kirk Russel Marsh appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the Rooker-Feldman
∗
doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Marsh v. Utah, No. 1:24-cv-00516-PTG-IDD (E.D. Va.
Sept. 13, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co.,
263 U.S. 413 (1923).

-- 2 of 2 --