Federico Dimas, Jr. v. PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General of the United States

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2031
FEDERICO DIMAS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General of the United States,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:22-cv-01355-RDA-LRV)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 28, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Stephen Christopher Swift, Charity Chidinma Emeronye Swift, SWIFT &
SWIFT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.L.L.C., for Appellant. Erik S. Siebert, United States
Attorney, Elizabeth A. Spavins, Carolyn M. Wesnousky, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Federico Dimas, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders (1) granting Defendant’s
motion to dismiss Dimas’ discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; and
(2) denying Dimas’ motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Dimas v. Bondi,
No. 1:22-cv-01355-RDA-LRV (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2023; Aug. 12, 2024). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --