Peter George Liounis v. United States of America

24-6204Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 de jun. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6204
PETER GEORGE LIOUNIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00311-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: June 6, 2024 Decided: June 20, 2024
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter George Liounis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Peter George Liounis appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his civil
action seeking relief under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80.
Liounis also appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. See Clendening v. United States,
19 F.4th 421, 432, 434-36 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing discretionary function exception),
cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 11 (2022); Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 407
(4th Cir. 2010) (explaining standard of review for denial of reconsideration motion).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Liounis v. United States, No.
5:23-cv-00311-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 6, 2024; Feb. 21, 2024). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.