Antonio Medrano Ortiz v. SHATEEMA PINCKNEY, Correctional Officer sued in individual

24-6530Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de out. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6530
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHATEEMA PINCKNEY, Correctional Officer sued in individual and official
capacity; TAMEKA SMITH, Unit-Manager sued in individual and official capacity;
REGINA HAMPTON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer sued in individual and official
capacity; MONICA BOND, Chief Disciplinary Hearing Officer sued in individual
and official capacity; SERGEANT BERNIE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00262-LCB-LPA)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 25, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Medrano Ortiz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Medrano Ortiz appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendations to dismiss, upon 28 U.S.C. § 1915A review, Ortiz’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Ortiz v. Pinckney, No. 1:24-cv-00262-LCB-LPA
(M.D.N.C. May 15, 2024). We grant Ortiz’s motion to correct his informal brief. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.