Jonathan James Newell v. JA’BARRI DAVIS, Correctional Officer

24-6553Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30 de jul. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6553
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ROY G. DAVIDSON; ANTOINE JERROD WATKINS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JA’BARRI DAVIS, Correctional Officer; A. SINGLETON, Correctional Officer;
SGT. JANE DOE DOWNEY; KIMBERLY HARRIS, Unit Manager of Granville
Dorm,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03129-BO)
Submitted: July 19, 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Jonathan James Newell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan James Newell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting
Defendants’ motion to reopen the case scheduling order and denying Newell’s subsequent
motion to quash that order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
orders Newell seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or
collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.